For teachers
Engineering standards
This shows how the lesson connects to the national NGSS engineering standards and what student work you can collect.
3-5-ETS1-1
Teams define a desk-related need and identify success criteria plus size, material, and time constraints.
What students show: Completed problem frame and labeled design sketch.3-5-ETS1-2
Teams sketch two ideas and select one using a criteria-and-constraints check.
What students show: Two sketches and a written or spoken comparison.3-5-ETS1-3
Teams use the same three-part test before and after revising one feature.
What students show: Test record showing a result, revision, and retest.Materials
- Sticky notes and pencils
- Rulers
- Cardboard, index cards, tape, and modeling clay
- Small classroom objects for testing
- Shared tablet or computer with beginner 3D-design software
- PLA filament; target 8–15 g per team
Teacher preparation
- Gather examples such as a pencil rest, cable guide, name-tag stand, or supply divider without presenting one as the required answer.
- Create team material trays and a 10 cm × 10 cm size-check card.
- Prepare a shared file folder and naming rule: G3_Team##_DeskTool_v1.
- Set a maximum print time of about 45 minutes per team and plan shared build plates across the 10 printers.
Step by step
How to teach it
Notice and define
- Students silently notice small desk frustrations.
- Teams choose one need and complete: ‘We need a way to…’
- Set criteria: what must the tool do? Set constraints: size, material, time, or cost.
Imagine and compare
- Each team makes two labeled sketches.
- Circle features that address each criterion.
- Use a simple plus/check/minus comparison to choose or combine ideas.
Build and test
- Build a cardboard or clay prototype.
- Write one repeatable three-step test.
- Run the test twice and record what happened without changing the test.
Improve and explain
- Change one feature based on evidence.
- Retest using the same procedure.
- Share: ‘Our evidence showed…, so we changed…’
Move into 3D
- Measure the improved prototype.
- Create a small digital model using basic solids and holes.
- Teacher checks dimensions, stability, naming, and print time before adding it to the queue.
- After printing, teams compare the printed object with their prototype and record one next improvement.
Assessment
- Problem includes a clear need, two criteria, and two constraints.
- Sketches show two meaningfully different possibilities.
- Test is repeatable and linked to a criterion.
- Revision is supported by recorded evidence.
Supports & extensions
- Provide picture cards of common desk needs.
- Use sentence stems for the problem and evidence statements.
- Allow drawing, speaking, or teacher scribing instead of extended writing.
- Offer pre-cut cardboard shapes and adaptive scissors.
- Extension: calculate footprint area and reduce material while keeping performance.
Safety & responsible use
- Students do not touch hot ends, heated beds, or moving printer parts.
- An adult handles slicing approval, printer setup, part removal, and sharp tools.
- Use only lab-approved filament and supervised software accounts.
No-machine alternative
Use air-dry clay, cardboard, or reusable building pieces as the final product. Complete the same measurement, test, and revision cycle without printing.
Printable student design brief
The challenge
Design a small tool that makes a classroom desk easier, safer, or more organized to use.
Success criteria
- Solves the chosen problem
- Stays stable during use
- Can be explained and tested
Constraints
- Fits inside 10 cm × 10 cm × 10 cm
- Uses one small print or a no-print prototype
- Can be tested during class


